-
Bob Novak
I could have posted this entry several days ago, but I wasn’t sure my street cred could withstand so many references to Sunday news programs all at once.
On Meet the Press Sunday morning, Tim Russert was speaking with Bob Novak about the Republican candidates’ prospects for winnng the presidential election in 2008. Mr Novak talked about the pessimism he’s heard in Republican circles regarding the upcomming election (re: Iraq), and all of the things going for Democrats. Then, he said something to the effect of: “leave it to the Democrats to try something new in this election, running the first woman or black candidate… it’s really giving the Republican party hope.”
There was a story in the New Republic this week that compared Obama’s candidacy to Kennedy’s in 1960:
The subtly bigoted phrase most often repeated in that election year–by former President Harry Truman, among others–was that 1960 was “too early” for a Catholic president, that the country was “not ready,” and that Kennedy should be a “good sport” by settling for the vice presidency.
Mr. Novak’s comment seems awfully similar to me.
Does this mean these “relieved” Republicans are banking on stereotype and prejudice to carry the day for them? Does this solidify their position as the party of the “white, rich male,” as if they weren’t already? Or, is this just an example of cynical, political opportunism? I would have liked to see Bob have an opportunity to expand on this notion, but it was kind of said in passing… and no one came back to it. (A real shame.)
I may be reading WAY too much into Mr. Novak’s comment, but I couldn’t shake the feeling that it WAS an example of “subtle bigotry.” The *way* he said it just seemed so smug… giving me the impression he not only agreed the Republican candidates chances were better with black or woman candidate running against them… he didn’t think a black or woman candidate could be effective.
While Obama doesn’t seem to be taking too many overt race related lumps yet, it seems to me that Clinton has been treated a little unfairly. I’ll make one thing clear… Clinton is not my idea of “best friend” material. She comes across as a political opportunist herself… and distant… but is she really so different from other politicians? The negative response seems so out of proportion to me. How many prominent polititians aren’t political opportunists?
You could say that I’m guilty of stereotyping myself, using my broad brush to paint Republicans as dinosaurs from the pre-civil rights era. The beauty of Mr Novak’s MTP segment is that I don’t have to rely on my own prejudice (regarding the Republican party), Mr Novak was doing his best to prove it’s warranted.
-
Unbeknownst to all but a precious few, I am once again cool
For years I have blogged in total anonymity. I blogged before I knew I was “blogging,” posting random messages to my first site hosted by AOL those many moons ago. For a long time my only regular visitor was my sister… that’s DOCTOR sister to you! Several years back my readership doubled, then trippled… and oh my God… rocketed to darn near close to half a dozen regular or occasional readers.
At first everyone thought it was cool that I had my own web site. That stopped being so cool in a few years. Then everyone (well, one person anyway) though it was cool that I was blogging… until there were more blogs than people (on Earth).
Now I am cool once again.
We Americans can be an egocentric lot. I once heard someone threaten to call immigration on a Puerto Rican for not having a visa or “green card” (they were gently reminded that Puerto Rico is a U.S. Territory… thus, they were a U.S. citizen… and didn’t need a visa or green card). Alas, I’m not immune. I’ve had my head stuck in the American sand on more than one occasion… but I’d like to think there’s a silver lining… sort of. For me anyway, anything at all foreign is exotic. My sister visited Toronto earlier this year and brought back candies flavored with something called “Ice Wine.” I thought it was the best thing since real maple syrup. Alright, maybe it wasn’t as good as real maple syrup… but it was delightfully different. Knowing little about other places, and only once having traveled out of my time zone (other than driving to New Orleans, but that was less than a 12 hour drive so I don’t really count that), there are lots of places in this world that are just brimming with undiscovered wonders.
Similarly, I am fascinated by people from other places. The lives we lead are shaped by the places we live, and I rarely tire hearing the particulars. A professor at U.F. told me about his days in North Dakota, plugging in his engine heater at night so the fluids didn’t freeze. That was awesome (especially for a Florida boy, with only vague memories of his first 8 years in New England – which still don’t touch winters in the Dakotas anyway).
Now imagine my excitement having honest to goodness foreigners visiting the site? And what could be better than representatives from the vast, northern enigma that is Canada? In many ways similar and in many ways different, I think there are many Americans who don’t quite know what to make of Canada (other than it’s -mostly- north of here, and generally colder). Some of us scoff at them, some of us threaten to join them after presidential elections, and some of us don’t pay any attention at all… but I’m just, well… curious. To me small, nuanced differences can be just as fascinated as big ones. You could argue that there ARE big differences, but surely they’re not as large as the differences between, say, “western” and “easter” cultures. We largely come from the same European stock, after all… (perhaps) taking slightly different paths at the end of the 18th century.
My wife is amused I get a kick out of dropping the occasional reference to “my Canadian readers.” Although my sleep cycle regrets the reading and light research I do (stemming from all this norther exposure), folks at work humor my shared observations about media, gun culture, and health care (their possible differences in our societies – and how they’ve affected us); and I get a kick out of the discussions that come of them.
I’m glad I’ve had the opportunity to expand my horizons, even if it’s only a little. And to think that all of this comes from a reclined, stationary position in my family room… it doesn’t cease to amaze me (even if I did grow up in the “via satellite” age).
-
Is Charlie Crist a pinko?
So sayeth the Wall Street Journal (via the St Pete Times):
It isn’t easy to put one of the more well governed states on the path to fiscal ruin in a mere three months, but it seems Florida Governor Charlie Crist is exceptional. His campaign to socialize Florida’s insurance market has placed the Sunshine State one big hurricane away from financial disaster….Mr. Crist and his fellow Republicans had better hope that predictions of more frequent hurricanes are wrong. Because when they hit, and taxpayers discover there’s no such thing as free insurance, what could get blown away is their governing majority.
I’ll bet plenty of WSJ staffers have visited, but have they lived here? One of the more well governed states? Holy hades, Batman! Jeb makes George look like a pinko. Crist, a political moderate, looks like a reanimated Lenin in comparison.
Note to the WSJ: under the status quo (in the so called “more well governed” state), Florida was ALREADY one big hurricane away from financial disaster. Private companies were dropping homeowner’s insurance policy holders left and right, claiming financial losses… while rates went through the roof, and profits remained steady – buoyed by auto insurance profits (which conveniently are operated under different ledgers). Meanwhile, the state run safety net for homeowners insurance (“Citizens”) was required by statute to charge a certain percentage more than private carriers (to protect private carrier’s profits, not having to compete with the state).
The state was already stuck covering all of the worst risks, after private companies cherry-picked properties with the least risk. Is the state really worse off taking on more policies… some with less risk, to balance out the cost of the more risky ones?
I may be a little slow, but that sounds like pretty good business to me.