Strong statements before the debate

Politico via TPM:

A growing number of Republicans are expressing concern about Sarah Palin’s uneven — and sometimes downright awkward — performances in her limited media appearances.
Conservative columnists Kathleen Parker, a former Palin supporter, says the vice presidential nominee should step aside. Kathryn Jean Lopez, writing on the conservative National Review, says “that’s not a crazy suggestion” and that “something’s gotta change.”

Tony Fabrizio, a GOP strategist, says Palin’s recent CBS appearance isn’t disqualifying but is certainly alarming. “You can’t continue to have interviews like that and not take on water.”

The pundit consensus was the Couric/Gibson interviews would essentially be pre-season, softball interviews. What on earth would happen with the so-called tough interviewers? Listening to Jim Lehrer this evening, I wonder how she’d do with him moderating the VP debate.

Nice pic here.

5 Comments

Last minute plans

At nine o’clock this morning I approached my boss with a question disguised as a statement: “I’ll understand if the answer is no, but I’d really like to go to the Obama thing this morning.” I said it with a pinch of man-pout and a hint of pleading in my tone… because I have no shame. I stayed until ten, tying up some loose ends, then took off for home. I grabbed the old camera, threw on a pair of shorts, stuffed in a few snack bars and a package of peanut butter crackers for good luck, and headed out for something I hope will be a little piece of history.

Barack Obama was in Dunedin today, filling the stands at Knology Park. The speech wasn’t anything special. If you’ve been watching the news you’ve probably already heard most of it (if not all) before. But I wasn’t there just to hear a speech. The shy guy wanted to try his hand playing against type. He wanted to participate in a rally.

I parked a couple miles up the street, at the former headquarters of AC Neilsen (it’s been vacant since they left ten years ago). Standing in line for the shuttle bus to the stadium, I got to talking with a Canadian citizen living in the U.S. She couldn’t even vote, but here she was, getting set to wait for hours… just to hear Obama speak. It was one of several pleasant surprises… and it kept with a trend in my life. I’ve yet to meet a Canadian I didn’t like. It’s kinda weird that we were heading to the spring training home of the Toronto Blue Jays. That probably means something, I just have to figure out what it is. The bus dropped us off in front of the stadium, which would have been perfect if there was no line. The line stretched a mile or two… back the way we came. You might think I’d be discouraged at this point, but it was quite the opposite. I thought it was great. I was surrounded by thousands of like minded, enthusiastic liberals. It was like having ten thousand friends, all in the same place, and we all had the same birthday – today. It was fantastic. We got the chance to see almost every one of them, making our way to the end of a VERY long line. If you know me, you probably know I’m a quiet guy. I brought my Palm along thinking I’d have a lot of time to do some reading. I didn’t touch it. I didn’t even think about it.

Three quarters of the way back to the end a back-hoe stopped next to us. My new Canadian friend called out to the driver, “Hey, are you going this way? Can I get a ride?” He was, and she did.

“Hey John, I’ll save you a place… and hey, could you take a picture?!?”

Can I have a ride?


It takes forever for my old camera to turn on.

I spent more than two hours in line. If that sounds like a lot, it wasn’t. The conversation with the folks in line around me was smart, interesting, and constant. We talked blogging, economics, photography and Canadian politics… among other things. Forty-five minutes into our wait we caught sight of the stadium filling up – way off in the distance. When we were just getting off the bus we had a run-in with a VIP who took a little too much pleasure telling us the short line wasn’t our line. Seeing the stadium fill up I said to our group, “you know, those folks at the front of the line will feel awfully silly when they find out they’re filling up the stadium starting in back and working their way forward.” I admit it was wishful thinking, but I was in for a bit of a surprise.

I was that close (almost)


The overflow was standing room only – on the field around the podium. We weren’t more than forty feet away.

Warm


It was indescribable. Well, not for sheltered little me anyway. I was on the phone with Cheryl, gloating a little, and she had a video feed on her PC trying to pick me out. My new Canadian friend was yelling, “tell your friend you’re standing next to the blonde.” I’m laughing, “um, this is my wife.” “Oh, well I’m married too so she doesn’t have anything to worry about.”

Cheryl found that a little too funny. A guy could develop a complex.

Anyhoo, it’s hours later and I’m still a little blown away by it all. No, I didn’t go because I think Obama is some kind of later-day Jesus in shirt-sleeves. I know there’s more to picking a candidate than listening to rousing speeches. But I’ve also already made up my mind. I’ve been worrying about this election for months and I needed a little excitement. That’s what rallies are for, and I got what I needed. Some folks scoff at Obama’s “celebrity,” but I’ll tell you what… if you don’t see how someone can get excited by a candidate who shares your views, can speak about issues intelligently and eloquently, and has a real shot at winning, maybe there’s something wrong with your candiate. Where’s the harm in inspiring others into public service? What sin is committed believing government is more than just a mechanism to separate people from income? How dare he inspire others to care for those less fortunate.

One of the folks I met in line bought me an Obama towel and a pin (I only brought enough money to pick up some water on the way). When I said they didn’t have to do that, they responded, “I can’t let you go to something like this and not have something to bring home and remember it.” This was a perfect stranger, and it typified the day.

Now lets go out there and win this election. The bandwagon looked pretty full this afternoon, but there’s always room for more.

**Update: my new Canadian friend (who wanted to wait around for the bus rather than walk back) sends me this picture, telling me about a hand shake I missed.

obamashake.jpg


AAAAGH!

Well, so much for being perfect ;-)

1 Comment

Who am I?

I always knew I was the top gun and this year I’m finally getting my due. Friends know me as the maverick. I’m the reformer with results. My crowning acheivement was campaign finance reform, and I’m really proud of it. My fellow conservatives were madder than hell with me for a little while, but it’s not like it kept the RNC from funneling millions into “hybrid” ads. It all worked out in the end.

Friends, I know it hasn’t been all peaches and cream. I’ve had a few set backs. I was bushwhacked in my last run for the White House. My efforts to avoid Bush’s big tax cuts in 2001 didn’t work out. My progressive friends weren’t enough to get us past a filibuster in the Senate on imigration reform, let alone a possible veto by my new friend dubya; who’s so squirelly these days I don’t know wether he’s going to say something innane or dart out into traffic. Then again I’m not much better these days, so who am I to say?

But I’ll be a reformer till the day I die, and I’ve finally found something I can reform that’s assured success: my reputation.

Bush tax cuts? I love ’em now.

Imigration? I don’t know what the f— I was thinking! Secure those borders now! Son, when I say build a fence all I want to hear from you is “How high?!?”

Off shore drilling? Drill baby drill!

A history of appealing to the political middle? I’d like you to meet the most concervative woman runningmate I could find. Look-it her shooting wolves from an airplane. If that doesn’t make a gun-nut’s heart flutter they don’t have a heartbeat.

Honesty and integrity in politics? Hey, did you hear the one about my opponent teaching kindergartners about condoms, his staff calling my running-mate a white-trash whore, or his secret plan to triple your taxes?

OOH! I’ve got it! You can call me “the reformed maverick.”

I’m John McCain and I approved this fiction.

McCain and Spain

So take your pick. Either McCain isn’t as smart on foreign policy as he’d like you to think, he really is getting old, or he makes rash, dare I say reckless, decisions. Either way you slice it, he’s dangerous.

Maybe you’re thinking, “hey, it’s no biggie… who care’s if we piss off Spain.” Maybe you think our reputation in the world is just fine, thank you very much. Maybe you’re a fool too.

Damn, that’s probably not going to convince a lot of people, is it… calling people names? Sorry. I really needed to blow off some steam.

We are doomed

Here’s a quick rundown on a conversation I had recently.

“I’d never vote for Obama in a million years.”

“Why not?”

“I don’t trust him, and it’s not because he’s black.”

“Then why? Is it something he said? Something he didn’t say? Something about his background? Do you disagree with one of his positions?”

“No, there’s just something about him. I don’t know what it is, I just don’t trust him.”

I’m not going to delve too deeply into the “it’s not because he’s black” comment. I’m just saying it’s interesting it came up without prompting. What troubles me (besides the black comment) is: our criteria for the ideal candidate is completely and unapologetically superficial. Maybe it’d make more sense if someone beat me with a pipe wrench.

One of my favorite bits from Stephen Colbert’s infamous roast of Bush at the White House Correspondent’s Dinner was his opening. (transcript / video)

Mark Smith, ladies and gentlemen of the press corps, Madame First Lady, Mr. President, my name is Stephen Colbert, and tonight it is my privilege to celebrate this president, ‘cause we’re not so different, he and I. We both get it. Guys like us, we’re not some brainiacs on the nerd patrol. We’re not members of the factinista. We go straight from the gut. Right, sir?

That’s where the truth lies, right down here in the gut. Do you know you have more nerve endings in your gut than you have in your head? You can look it up. Now, I know some of you are going to say, “I did look it up, and that’s not true.” That’s ’cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut. I did. My gut tells me that’s how our nervous system works.

How many of you listened to your gut when you went to the polls in 2000? How about 2004? How did that turn out? Hell, a lab animal will stop pressing a lever after being shocked a few times. Do you have a gut we can believe in? If you’re still reading, I have this crazy idea I’d like you to consider. Let’s try choosing a candidate based on issues.

Maybe you think I’m being a little arrogant – assuming my candidate is the only one who wins on the issues. You know where I come from politically. I’m a living, breathing, political stereotype – born in the northeast, registered Democrat, never voted for a Republican Presidential candidate. (I wasn’t old enough until the 1992 election, so can you really blame me?)

But please, tell me where I’m wrong. Tell me where I’ve mixed up or exaggerated either candidates’ stand on the issues. Do you support the candidate who has consistently said (or strongly implied) the problem with Bush/Cheney’s foreign policy is it’s been too reserved in its use of military force? Do you support the candidate who believes the problem with the economy is it doesn’t give enough tax breaks to the wealthy? Do you support the party who will still tell you – with a straight face – our big problem is too much regulation. (Raise your hands… how many of you had money in AIG too?) Do you support the party who would continue to run regulatory agencies with the word “no” stricken from their vocabulary (unless they’re dealing with citizens’ groups)? Do you believe the free market is a magic pill for healthcare in this country? Do you believe the only thing standing between the uninsured and good healthcare is a tax credit that reimburses a fraction of the cost of premiums next year (when they file a return)? Are you against abortion, even in cases of rape or incest? Are you against equal rights for same sex partners? Do you support banning books in public libraries? Do you believe the evidence for mankind’s responsibility for global warming is inconclusive (at best)? Do you doubt the usefulness of renewable energy resources?

If you found yourself nodding your head a lot then the McCain/Palin ticket probably is your best bet. I wouldn’t be surprised. The words “liberal” and “regulation” have been thoroughly and effectively demonized by the right. You’ll make my heart ache, but everyone’s entitled to their opinion. However, if you’re still reading then there’s still hope. Look at the campaign he’s run and the running mate he’s picked. Look at the big hole dug by eight years of Bush and conservatism/neo-conservatism. Ask yourself if McCain is any different, or even remotely different enough.

Now ask yourself if your gut getting in the way of good sense.

McCain, economics, and regulation

Talking Points Memo | Just Thinking:

Let me get this straight. John McCain’s top economic advisor, former Sen. Phil Gramm, is the guy who authored the deregulation law that most agree is the ultimate cause of today’s financial meltdown. Tomorrow’s and probably next week’s too. But let’s not get ahead of ourselves. John Thain, CEO of Merrill Lynch, which swirled into brokerage oblivion today, is one of McCain’s top economic advisors too. And now McCain says he’s going to clean up the mess by putting in tighter regulations and oversight even though he’s always supported lax oversight and his top economics guy is the one who loosened the rules in the first place.

9/16/2008 NYT:

“I’m always for less regulation,” he told The Wall Street Journal last March, “but I am aware of the view that there is a need for government oversight” in situations like the subprime lending crisis, the problem that has cascaded through Wall Street this year. He concluded, “but I am fundamentally a deregulator.”

Later that month, he gave a speech on the housing crisis in which he called for less regulation, saying, “Our financial market approach should include encouraging increased capital in financial institutions by removing regulatory, accounting and tax impediments to raising capital.”

Yeah, what he said

I’m not a big Andrew Sullivan fan, but I’m with him on this one (a couple days ago):
The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan:

For me, this surreal moment – like the entire surrealism of the past ten days – is not really about Sarah Palin or Barack Obama or pigs or fish or lipstick. It’s about John McCain. The one thing I always thought I knew about him is that he is a decent and honest person. When he knows, as every sane person must, that Obama did not in any conceivable sense mean that Sarah Palin is a pig, what did he do? Did he come out and say so and end this charade? Or did he acquiesce in and thereby enable the mindless Rovianism that is now the core feature of his campaign?
So far, he has let us all down. My guess is he will continue to do so. And that decision, for my part, ends whatever respect I once had for him.

It’s not just about the pig thing, but a week’s worth of statements and ads that are deliberate lies. It’s funny how some of our friend’s in the GOP accuse Obama of a willingness to say anything to be elected. McCain’s just making stuff up.

1 Comment

Losing every bit of it

I had this one typed up last night but thought it might be overkill yesterday. If I start posting more than three or four entries in a day you’re going to think I don’t have a life. Well, that may be true, but I hate to be quite so obvious.

Here’s a response to McCain’s most recent dip in the muck: falsely accusing Obama of supporting comprehensive sex-ed to kindergartners (implying Obama supported teaching the full complement of sex ed to five year olds). This simply isn’t true.

McClatchy (via Time & TPM):

This is a deliberately misleading accusation. It came hours after the Obama campaign released a TV ad critical of McCain’s votes on public education. As a state senator in Illinois, Obama did vote for but was not a sponsor of legislation dealing with sex ed for grades K-12.

But the legislation allowed local school boards to teach “age-appropriate” sex education, not comprehensive lessons to kindergartners, and it gave schools the ability to warn young children about inappropriate touching and sexual predators…

Obama spokesman Bill Burton said Tuesday of McCain’s ad: “It is shameful and downright perverse for the McCain campaign to use a bill that was written to protect young children from sexual predators as a recycled and discredited political attack against a father of two young girls.”

Then there’s the dubious claim of sexism over the pig comment – a common idiom that McCain has used himself. Hell, am I the only one that thinks McCain is on shaky ground here, accusing someone of a disturbing trend of sexism, considering his long history of questionable comments? Many of his can’t be explained away… like that just plain disgusting joke about Janet Reno and Chelsea Clinton. You know, the one that resulted in apologies to then President Clinton, his cabinet, and a couple news organizations. And lets not forget McCain made the same reference when speaking of Hillary Clinton in October 2007. Pot meet kettle… only in this case McCain isn’t really a pot – more like a 35 gallon cauldron (assuming they make ’em that big).

Look, I’m assuming most of us can agree warning children away from sexual predators is a good thing. I’m assuming most of us can agree that joking about a politician’s daughter – and a minor at that, is flat out inexcusable. If we can agree on that much, perhaps you’ll entertain the notion McCain is a schmuck.

Meanwhile the McCain camp is giving themselves a big pat on the back. They’re seeing this stuff cause some movement in the polls, thanks to all of us – the lemmings of the political process. We’re lapping up his swill like milk laid out to a bunch of clueless, adoring puppies, and more is certain to be in the pipeline.

It’s gotten to the point that I don’t give a flip about his efforts at bipartisan reform – like campaign finance. Those were years ago now. The McCain of this election cycle has been a dirty politician without conscience. He’s lost a heck of a lot more than my vote. He’s lost my respect. Shame on him for stooping so low. Shame on you for listening.

1 Comment

Paul’s not the only one

(trichinosis?)

Yeah, but is Paul making that bit up about the lobbyist?

Washington Post (9/2/2008):

As mayor of Wasilla, however, Palin oversaw the hiring of Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh, an Anchorage-based law firm with close ties to Alaska’s most senior Republicans: Rep. Don Young and Sen. Ted Stevens, who was indicted in July on charges of accepting illegal gifts. The Wasilla account was handled by the former chief of staff to Stevens, Steven W. Silver, who is a partner in the firm…

Senate records show that Silver’s firm began working for Palin in early 2000, just as federal money began flowing.

In fiscal 2000, Wasilla received a $1 million earmark, tucked into a transportation appropriations bill, for a rail and bus project in the town. And in the winter of 2000, Palin appeared before congressional appropriations committees to seek earmarks, according to a report in the Anchorage Daily News.

Palin and the Wasilla City Council increased Silver’s fee from $24,000 to $36,000 a year by 2001, Senate records show.

Alex is right. There’s nothing wrong with pursuing earmarks. It’s accepted practice (recent Presidential campaigns not withstanding), and it’s legal.

Maverick
– noun
a lone dissenter, as an intellectual, an artist, or a politician, who takes an independent stand apart from his or her associates.

What’s wrong is brazenly pretending to be something that you’re not… lying for political gain. You know what’s even worse? Letting them get away with it. Can I tell you with certainty that my guy has never told a lie? Of course I can’t. But is he serving up this kind of whopper with a shit-eating grin every time he opens his mouth?

Even more politics

Yeah, I know I’ve been a little obsessed. In my defense, it’s pretty freaking important. Anyway, here’s a quick summary of a political discussion I witnessed today:

“I don’t share many of Palin’s political views, but she’s only McCain’s VP pick. I’ll take my chances with her and McCain over eight years with Obama’s pastor.”

My reply went something like this:
HUH?!? ONLY McCain’s VP?!? What, you figure McCain picked her because he doesn’t share her views – just to spice things up a little? So if you had to chose between someone who could end up President one day (dare I say likely), who you don’t agree with on the issues, and someone who may share your political views, but has a FORMER pastor you find distasteful – you’re going with the one who doesn’t share your views?

… or it would have, if I’d regained voluntary control over my larynx in time.

It’s really a shame you’re not here. You’d be witnessing my head exploding. It’s really quite a sight, or so I’m told. I’m tempted to take something I said a while ago back. Maybe some of you shouldn’t be voting.

I’m not used to feeling like the sane person in the room. It doesn’t feel as good as I thought it would.